Why isn’t Al Jazeera (of all people) taking Occupy Wall Street more seriously?

6 Oct

It’s not often I take issue with Al Jazeera’s reporting. It’s usually excellent. This though is a rather disappointing way to talk about the legitimacy of protest by people without institutional backing.
The unions joining the #occupywallstreet protests apparently "lend[s] the movement credibility." It’s brilliant that more groups are getting involved in the protest but the language Al Jazeera uses here is highly derogatory.
Were the views and actions of the Occupy Wall Street protesters somehow not credible before some recognised institutions lent their support to the movement? I’d say they absolutely were.
We’re going to see a lot more fluid, leaderless protest in the future which has been organised within online networks. This flexibility doesn’t mean the opinions held by organisers of and participants in protest are any less valid than big marches organised by unions.

Location:Abou Al Mahasen Square,,Egypt

About these ads

One Response to “Why isn’t Al Jazeera (of all people) taking Occupy Wall Street more seriously?”

  1. Ed Paton-Williams 06/10/2011 at 14:34 #

    This is Doug Rushkoff making essentially the same points and criticisms of the American media in a much longer (and better-written) form.

    http://edition.cnn.com/2011/10/05/opinion/rushkoff-occupy-wall-street/index.html

    Like

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 153 other followers

%d bloggers like this: